!function(n,t){function r(e,n){return Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(e,n)}function i(e){return void 0===e}if(n){var o={},s=n.TraceKit,a=[].slice,u="?";o.noConflict=function(){return n.TraceKit=s,o},o.wrap=function(e){function n(){try{return e.apply(this,arguments)}catch(e){throw o.report(e),e}}return n},o.report=function(){function e(e){u(),h.push(e)}function t(e){for(var n=h.length-1;n>=0;--n)h[n]===e&&h.splice(n,1)}function i(e,n){var t=null;if(!n||o.collectWindowErrors){for(var i in h)if(r(h,i))try{h[i].apply(null,[e].concat(a.call(arguments,2)))}catch(e){t=e}if(t)throw t}}function s(e,n,t,r,s){var a=null;if(w)o.computeStackTrace.augmentStackTraceWithInitialElement(w,n,t,e),l();else if(s)a=o.computeStackTrace(s),i(a,!0);else{var u={url:n,line:t,column:r};u.func=o.computeStackTrace.guessFunctionName(u.url,u.line),u.context=o.computeStackTrace.gatherContext(u.url,u.line),a={mode:"onerror",message:e,stack:[u]},i(a,!0)}return!!f&&f.apply(this,arguments)}function u(){!0!==d&&(f=n.onerror,n.onerror=s,d=!0)}function l(){var e=w,n=p;p=null,w=null,m=null,i.apply(null,[e,!1].concat(n))}function c(e){if(w){if(m===e)return;l()}var t=o.computeStackTrace(e);throw w=t,m=e,p=a.call(arguments,1),n.setTimeout(function(){m===e&&l()},t.incomplete?2e3:0),e}var f,d,h=[],p=null,m=null,w=null;return c.subscribe=e,c.unsubscribe=t,c}(),o.computeStackTrace=function(){function e(e){if(!o.remoteFetching)return"";try{var t=function(){try{return new n.XMLHttpRequest}catch(e){return new n.ActiveXObject("Microsoft.XMLHTTP")}},r=t();return r.open("GET",e,!1),r.send(""),r.responseText}catch(e){return""}}function t(t){if("string"!=typeof t)return[];if(!r(j,t)){var i="",o="";try{o=n.document.domain}catch(e){}var s=/(.*)\:\/\/([^:\/]+)([:\d]*)\/{0,1}([\s\S]*)/.exec(t);s&&s[2]===o&&(i=e(t)),j[t]=i?i.split("\n"):[]}return j[t]}function s(e,n){var r,o=/function ([^(]*)\(([^)]*)\)/,s=/['"]?([0-9A-Za-z$_]+)['"]?\s*[:=]\s*(function|eval|new Function)/,a="",l=10,c=t(e);if(!c.length)return u;for(var f=0;f0?s:null}function l(e){return e.replace(/[\-\[\]{}()*+?.,\\\^$|#]/g,"\\$&")}function c(e){return l(e).replace("<","(?:<|<)").replace(">","(?:>|>)").replace("&","(?:&|&)").replace('"','(?:"|")').replace(/\s+/g,"\\s+")}function f(e,n){for(var r,i,o=0,s=n.length;or&&(i=s.exec(o[r]))?i.index:null}function h(e){if(!i(n&&n.document)){for(var t,r,o,s,a=[n.location.href],u=n.document.getElementsByTagName("script"),d=""+e,h=/^function(?:\s+([\w$]+))?\s*\(([\w\s,]*)\)\s*\{\s*(\S[\s\S]*\S)\s*\}\s*$/,p=/^function on([\w$]+)\s*\(event\)\s*\{\s*(\S[\s\S]*\S)\s*\}\s*$/,m=0;m]+)>|([^\)]+))\((.*)\))? in (.*):\s*$/i,o=n.split("\n"),u=[],l=0;l=0&&(v.line=g+x.substring(0,j).split("\n").length)}}}else if(o=d.exec(i[y])){var _=n.location.href.replace(/#.*$/,""),T=new RegExp(c(i[y+1])),E=f(T,[_]);v={url:_,func:"",args:[],line:E?E.line:o[1],column:null}}if(v){v.func||(v.func=s(v.url,v.line));var k=a(v.url,v.line),A=k?k[Math.floor(k.length/2)]:null;k&&A.replace(/^\s*/,"")===i[y+1].replace(/^\s*/,"")?v.context=k:v.context=[i[y+1]],h.push(v)}}return h.length?{mode:"multiline",name:e.name,message:i[0],stack:h}:null}function y(e,n,t,r){var i={url:n,line:t};if(i.url&&i.line){e.incomplete=!1,i.func||(i.func=s(i.url,i.line)),i.context||(i.context=a(i.url,i.line));var o=/ '([^']+)' /.exec(r);if(o&&(i.column=d(o[1],i.url,i.line)),e.stack.length>0&&e.stack[0].url===i.url){if(e.stack[0].line===i.line)return!1;if(!e.stack[0].line&&e.stack[0].func===i.func)return e.stack[0].line=i.line,e.stack[0].context=i.context,!1}return e.stack.unshift(i),e.partial=!0,!0}return e.incomplete=!0,!1}function v(e,n){for(var t,r,i,a=/function\s+([_$a-zA-Z\xA0-\uFFFF][_$a-zA-Z0-9\xA0-\uFFFF]*)?\s*\(/i,l=[],c={},f=!1,p=v.caller;p&&!f;p=p.caller)if(p!==g&&p!==o.report){if(r={url:null,func:u,args:[],line:null,column:null},p.name?r.func=p.name:(t=a.exec(p.toString()))&&(r.func=t[1]),"undefined"==typeof r.func)try{r.func=t.input.substring(0,t.input.indexOf("{"))}catch(e){}if(i=h(p)){r.url=i.url,r.line=i.line,r.func===u&&(r.func=s(r.url,r.line));var m=/ '([^']+)' /.exec(e.message||e.description);m&&(r.column=d(m[1],i.url,i.line))}c[""+p]?f=!0:c[""+p]=!0,l.push(r)}n&&l.splice(0,n);var w={mode:"callers",name:e.name,message:e.message,stack:l};return y(w,e.sourceURL||e.fileName,e.line||e.lineNumber,e.message||e.description),w}function g(e,n){var t=null;n=null==n?0:+n;try{if(t=m(e))return t}catch(e){if(x)throw e}try{if(t=p(e))return t}catch(e){if(x)throw e}try{if(t=w(e))return t}catch(e){if(x)throw e}try{if(t=v(e,n+1))return t}catch(e){if(x)throw e}return{mode:"failed"}}function b(e){e=1+(null==e?0:+e);try{throw new Error}catch(n){return g(n,e+1)}}var x=!1,j={};return g.augmentStackTraceWithInitialElement=y,g.guessFunctionName=s,g.gatherContext=a,g.ofCaller=b,g.getSource=t,g}(),o.extendToAsynchronousCallbacks=function(){var e=function(e){var t=n[e];n[e]=function(){var e=a.call(arguments),n=e[0];return"function"==typeof n&&(e[0]=o.wrap(n)),t.apply?t.apply(this,e):t(e[0],e[1])}};e("setTimeout"),e("setInterval")},o.remoteFetching||(o.remoteFetching=!0),o.collectWindowErrors||(o.collectWindowErrors=!0),(!o.linesOfContext||o.linesOfContext<1)&&(o.linesOfContext=11),void 0!==e&&e.exports&&n.module!==e?e.exports=o:"function"==typeof define&&define.amd?define("TraceKit",[],o):n.TraceKit=o}}("undefined"!=typeof window?window:global)},"./webpack-loaders/expose-loader/index.js?require!./shared/require-global.js":function(e,n,t){(function(n){e.exports=n.require=t("./shared/require-global.js")}).call(n,t("../../../lib/node_modules/webpack/buildin/global.js"))}});
This has been my experience too. Furthermore, I do not recommend Spinrewriter because I found a major flaw. The save feature does not work so that you can finish editing your article at a later time if you choose to. So if you don’t finish spinning your article like you want it all in just one sitting, then you’re screwed because when you come back more than likely your work won’t be saved where you left off, so you then have to edit and tweak manually. This is what I’ve experienced time & time again with this flawed software. I contacted spinwriter support about this and they didn’t deny the problem or even offer to fix it. This is poor support and obvious that key features such as this do not work as advertised or as presented. Therefore, I DO NOT recommend Spinrewriter.
You can copy/paste up to 10 articles and spin them. You have the option to either download the completed articles or you can download them in Spintax format. You can also import articles from files if you need to. It only takes a few moments to churn out 10 unique articles that are ready to post. The only drawback is that you can only spin 10 articles at a time. This is to reduce the server load.
Spin Rewriter 7.0 is the latest version of Spin Rewriter and was released in October 2016.  It’s a web based article spinning tool that works in your browser and is extremely powerful for creating and generation unique content with a few clicks. Spin Rewriter has become the best article spinner in 2016 due to it’s powerful features, top-class support and constant improvements.
Pricing starts at just $29—a fraction of the cost of an original article. If you try Chimp Rewriter and love it, you’ll never pay for SEO content again, thanks to a very small investment that will pay for itself over and over again. What do you have to lose? Over 31,000 marketers and SEO agencies are already using Chimp Rewriter. Why aren’t you? Click below to try it risk free right now for 14 days.
I made a huge mistake when buying Spin Rewriter. No, my mistake wasn’t buying the product itself. My mistake was not buying the Gold Membership when it was presented at a discount during the purchasing process. I know what you’re thinking, “upsells are just ways for the marketer to make more money!” While this is generally true, the upsells that come along with the Spin Rewriter are loaded with real value.

It would really be ideal to have a content spinner where the result can be used on your primary blogs so if I’m lazy to write an article, I can just grab some articles somewhere then just spin it using my content spinner, but for me, the processed articles by Spin Rewriter is still not worthy to be published on primary blogs, but you can still try it if you want but make sure to read it meticulously and correct any grammatical errors.
Use Article Rewriter to rewrite or paraphrase articles, full-length essays, or to find different and better ways to express simple words, phrases, or sentences. Whether you wish to reproduce textual content for a website, business document, email, tweet, or term paper, article rewriter will do the trick. Facilitate essay writing, expand your blogs and enhance your website’s online visibility with quality content now.
When looking for a spinner that I could use for tier 1 links I tried out almost everything on the market. The ones that turned out the best were Spin Rewriter and WordAi Turing. This article isn’t a head to head comparison against the two so I won’t go into detail about WordAi but my reason for choosing Spin Rewriter was that the quality is exactly the same and Spin Rewriter costs over $200 less per year.
Nope! Spin Rewriter 7.0 also understands the content itself and only then uses the amazing database of relevant keywords for both words and phrases to spin the article. Spin Rewriter 4.0 didn’t have such a great understanding of the content, however with the new Spin Rewriter 5.0, things are looking brighter and brighter for this content rewriter software. Top put a cherry on top, Spin Rewriter offers a “One-Click-Rewrite!” feature which is self-explanatory and provides amazing results. But talk is cheap. Here is another example of content spinning. I think this is really good for the price of 77$ for a full year of access to the software.
You can always tell when you visit a website that is using spun content. At best, the article reads like it was written by someone who doesn’t speak English as a first language and at worst you cannot even make sense of the text on the screen. As Google gets more and more advance, jibberish articles packed with links aren’t going to do your website any good and might actually do damage to your rankings.
By far Chimp Rewriter is off the charts! And a far better article spinner than the competition, and believe we I tried them all. Overall we made the right choice on choosing Chimp Rewriter. It’s simply faster, better, accurate, and the synonym data base is unique and loaded. Chimp Rewriter has all the great features to use for our online business. There is no debate here!

We use Spin Rewriter mostly through Kontent Machine 3. As I showed you above, you can use the API of Spin Rewriter 7.0 and seamlessly connect to it through KM3. Because of the ease of use of Kontent Machine 3, with which you can setup and start content scraping campaigns within seconds, we can generate highly spun, highly unique tier-dependent quality content for our GSA Search Engine Ranker and campaigns and FCS Networker projects.
It is also very helpful for people who struggle with the English language in general and writing in particular. A free article spinner or paraphrase tool makes it easier for them to get new content with minimal effort. The quality of content created with article rewriter is close to human written content if not equally good. To ensure the quality, you can edit content to fix any errors.
Spin Rewriter integrates with almost any SEO software. This allows you to post high quality articles quickly and easily. The only drawback is that you only get something like 300 API requests every 24 hours. You can quickly burn through this if you’re doing multiple campaigns. The developer does not currently offer a plan for heavy API users but maybe they will in the future.

When you integrate Perfect Tense with Spin Rewriter, Perfect Tense will check your seed article for grammatical mistakes before Spin Rewriter spins it. With higher quality seed articles, Spin Rewriter will be able to create higher quality content. In many instances, these improvements will lead to spun content that is higher quality than the original.


https://www.inetsolutions.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Spin-Rewriter-7.0-Honest-Review-Cutting-Edge-Cost-Effective-Content-Spinning-Software.jpg 1080 1920 root https://www.inetsolutions.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Inet-Solutions-Symbol-Plain18-80x80.png root2016-10-29 10:19:222016-10-29 10:20:00Spin Rewriter 7.0 Honest Review - Cutting-Edge & Cost-Effective Content Spinning Software
There is a completely new feature - Team Version, SpinnerChief 5 is the only article spinner that has a team version now, which is especially designed for team using, create/manage/use team thesaurus with team members together, and multi-users can use the license on different computer with themselves member accounts. Manager can manage team members easily.

I have actually tried several article spinner before such as The Best Spinner and Magic Article Rewriter and Word AI, although what made me try Spin Rewriter is it’s cloud based, which means you don’t have to install it on your PC and you can access it anywhere as long as you have an internet connection, and it’s a lot cheaper than Word AI. Also, Spin Rewriter can be integrated to the SEO tool that I will be using in my campaigns.


Nope! Spin Rewriter 7.0 also understands the content itself and only then uses the amazing database of relevant keywords for both words and phrases to spin the article. Spin Rewriter 4.0 didn’t have such a great understanding of the content, however with the new Spin Rewriter 5.0, things are looking brighter and brighter for this content rewriter software. Top put a cherry on top, Spin Rewriter offers a “One-Click-Rewrite!” feature which is self-explanatory and provides amazing results. But talk is cheap. Here is another example of content spinning. I think this is really good for the price of 77$ for a full year of access to the software.

For many years people used article spinners to mass produce unique content from one source article without really thinking about the quality and the human-friendly flow when it came to a real human having to read the content they landed on when visiting the website. Much more emphasis was put on producing content that was purely made to fool the search engines and rank the website accordingly.
×